Can everyone actually use your site?

Images nobody described. Form fields with no label. Headings that skip from H1 to H4. These are small things to fix and large things to live with if you rely on a screen reader. This audit finds them across your pages.

Eight checks, each mapped to the WCAG criterion it comes from
Heading order, landmarks, and link text that says more than "click here"
A per-page table so you know where to start

Run your free audit

The floor, not the ceiling.

This audit reads your markup and checks it against WCAG. Everything it flags is a real failure worth fixing. But we will not tell you that a clean score means your site is accessible, because it does not: no automated tool can tell whether someone using a screen reader can complete a purchase, or whether your focus order makes sense, or whether your error messages are comprehensible.

Accessibility audit FAQs

No. Roughly a third of WCAG can be checked automatically. This audit covers that third well.

It is a starting point, not evidence. If accessibility matters to you for legal reasons, you want a manual audit against the specific standard you are being held to, by someone who will put their name to it. We can help with that; this tool is not it.

WCAG 2.1. Each of the eight checks is labeled with the success criterion it comes from, such as 1.1.1 for alt text, 3.3.2 for form labels, and so on, so you can look up the actual requirement rather than trusting our summary.

Because an empty alt attribute is the correct way to mark an image a screen reader should skip. We only count alt as missing when the attribute is absent entirely. Flagging deliberate decorative images would train you to ignore the number.

Up to fifteen. Accessibility problems usually live in templates rather than individual pages, so a spread across your site tends to find every distinct issue you have.

Usually, yes, and most of it is small: alt text, labels, heading order, landmarks.